Wrenching from context: The manipulation of commitments

Douglas Walton, Fabrizio Macagno

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article analyses the fallacy of wrenching from context, using the dialectical notions of commitment and implicature as tools. The data, a set of key examples, is used to sharpen the conceptual borderlines around the related fallacies of straw man, accent, misquotation, and neglect of qualifications. According to the analysis, the main characteristics of wrenching from context are the manipulation of the meaning of the other's statement through devices such as the use of misquotations, selective quotations, and quoting out of context. The theoretical tools employed in the analysis are pragmatic theories of meaning and a dialectical model of commitment, used to explain how and why a standpoint is distorted. The analysis is based on a conception of fallacies as deceptive strategic moves in a game of dialogue. As a consequence, our focus is not only on misquotations as distortions of meaning, but on how they are used as dialectical tools to attack an opponent or win a dispute. Wrenching from context is described as a fallacy of unfairly attributing a commitment to another party that he never held. Its power as a deceptive argumentation tactic is based on complex mechanisms of implicit commitments and on their misemployment to improperly suggest an attribution of commitment.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)283-317
Number of pages35
JournalArgumentation
Volume24
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2010

Keywords

  • Ambiguity
  • Commitment
  • Emphasis
  • Fallacy
  • Implicature
  • Misquotation
  • Selection bias
  • Selective quotation
  • Special pleading

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Wrenching from context: The manipulation of commitments'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this